
AUGUST 2005 |
Inside Washington
by Janet Kopenhaver, AWPA Director of Government Affairs |
TRADE
. Changed Circumstances for Wire Rod
The US Commerce Department recently announced its final results in the "changed
circumstances" review of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Trinidad
and Tobago. The Department has found that Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited
is the successor-in-interest to Caribbean Ispat Limited for purposes of
applying the dumping duty deposit rate and dumping margin in this antidumping
proceeding. Accordingly, Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited will receive
Caribbean Ispat Limited's dumping duty deposit rate of 3.61%.
The Department is currently conducting an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order against Trinidad and Tobago covering the period
from October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004. According to the Department,
Mittal Steel Point Lisas is participating in the review.
The Commerce Department also announced the final results in the "changed
circumstances" review of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from
Canada. The Department has found that Mittal Canada Inc. is the successor-in-interest
to Ispat Sidbec for purposes of applying the dumping duty deposit rate
and dumping margin in this antidumping proceeding. Accordingly, Mittal
Canada Inc. will receive Ispat Sidbec's dumping duty deposit rate of 3.86%.
Finally, Commerce announced the final results of its administrative
review of stainless steel wire rod from India. The review covered three
Indian manufacturers/exporters - Chandan Steel Ltd., Isibars Ltd., and
the Viraj Group Ltd. - during the period from December 1, 2002 through
November 30, 2003.
The Commerce Department has calculated the following weighted-average
dumping margins: a) Chandan Steel Ltd - 2.10%; b) Isibars Ltd. (including
its affiliated companies Zenstar Impex and Shaktiman Steel Casting Pvt.
Ltd.) - 27.20%; and c) the Viraj Group Ltd (including its affiliated companies
Viraj Alloys Ltd. And VSL Wires Ltd.) - 0.00%.
In addition, Commerce has decided to revoke the antidumping order with
respect to stainless steel wire rod produced and exported by Viraj. The
basis for this decision is that Viraj was found not to be dumping in three
consecutive administrative reviews and that the merchandise under review
was sold in "commercial quantities" in all three review periods.
Accordingly, effective July 13, 2005, the dumping duty deposit rates
for these companies will be the margins found in the review. The previous
dumping duty deposit rates were 0.00% for Viraj and 48.80% for Chandan
and Isibars.
. Trade Promotion Authority Renewed for Two Years
The President's authority to negotiate trade agreements that Congress can
approve or reject but not amend was renewed for another two years on July
1st. The 2002 law granting Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) provided that
it would automatically be extended until July 1, 2007, unless either the
House or Senate passed a resolution of disapproval by July 1, 2005, which
did not happen. A brand new TPA bill will have to be written and approved
by 2007.
ENVIRONMENTAL
. Hexavalent Chrome Rule Could Cost Billions
An Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposal to lower
the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for worker exposure to hexavalent
chromium would cost manufacturers nearly $2.9 billion per year in compliance
costs, according to an economist who testified on behalf of industry groups
at a Government Reform Committee subcommittee hearing.
This OSHA rule would lower the allowable 8-hour exposure for hexavalent
chromium - a known carcinogen - from 52 micrograms per cubic meter of
air to 1 microgram, a change that according to industry officials is far
too drastic.
Economist Stuart Sessions told the Regulatory Affairs Subcommittee that
the rule would impose the largest costs on aerospace manufacturing, metal
finishing and steel industries.
Industry's estimate of $2.9 billion per year is well above Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) estimates of between $223 million and $1 billion
per year, as noted by subcommittee Chairwoman Candice Miller (R-MI). Sessions
said the discrepancy is the result of strong disagreements about technology
and unit costs.
Citing the high costs associated with containing the carcinogen, ranking
member Stephen Lynch (D-MA) asked Sessions whether a tax credit for ventilation
equipment would help industry comply. Sessions said that would be very
helpful for most of the industries affected by the chemical.
Back to Wireline Contents
American Wire Producers Association
801 North Fairfax Street, Suite 211
Tel (703) 299-4434 | Fax (703) 299-9233 | E-mail info@awpa.org | Web: www.awpa.org
|