
February 2007 |
Inside Washington
by Janet Kopenhaver, AWPA Director of Government Affairs |
TRADE
FTA Update
Bush Administration officials have begun the uphill work
of moving trade deals with Peru, Panama and Colombia through Congress.
Labor remains the linchpin for congressional approval of those agreements.
Democrats seek a return to something along the lines of the labor provision
in the US-Jordan free trade agreement. At a minimum, Democrats want trade
agreements to spur improvement in those laws by obligating countries
to meet core international labor standards. And they want violations
punishable by trade sanctions, the same penalty available for skirting
commercial obligations.
The Bush Administration has therefore agreed to
negotiate changes in the labor chapters of the trade deals with these
three countries. “We
are open to a dialogue with Congress regarding the labor chapter in those
agreements,” said Deputy Trade Representative John Veroneau. “It
is clear that some adjustments to that chapter will be made before Congress
takes those up.” Further, the countries have been notified that
changes will be necessary, and they understand the need for some accommodations
to ensure broad bipartisan support on Capitol Hill.
Reaching agreement
on the labor provisions alone might be a formidable challenge before
March 30 - the date that agreed-upon language must be in place for the
Peru, Colombia or Panama agreements to be considered under current trade
negotiating authority rules.
There is also a split between Democrats and
the Administration about the legal instrument that should be used to
add strengthened labor commitments to trade deals. White House officials
insist the additions must be dealt with through side letters in the case
of Peru and Colombia since those agreements have already been signed.
Administration
Officials Split on Doha
US Trade Representative Susan Schwab told reporters that
she still hopes there will be progress on the Doha round. Jean-Luc Demarty,
Director General for Agriculture in the European Commission, had offered
to reduce EU agricultural tariffs by 55% to 56% rather than the 39% in
its most recent offer and that US negotiators had offered to reduce US
trade-distorting subsidies to $17.5 billion per year rather than $22
billion.
Meanwhile, Agriculture Secretary Johanns took a hard line
on prospects for the Doha Round saying the US position would depend on
the willingness of other countries to offer easier market access to US
agricultural products. Johanns added that he regarded criticism from
other countries that the Bush Administration’s farm bill would
not reduce subsidies enough as a “lot of noise” and that
he considers such criticism “an
interesting distraction” from working on the Doha round.
Freshmen
Want Voice in Trade
Claiming a mandate from voters, the House’s large
class of Democratic freshmen is seeking a role in shaping trade legislation
the chamber might consider this year. Thirty-nine of the 42 first-term
Democrats wrote to House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-NY)
asking to be heard “in
crafting a new model for US trade agreements.” The effort was led
by Rep. Betty Sutton (D-OH) who was elected to fill the seat of now-Sen.
Sherrod Brown, who was long a key House opponent of Bush Administration
trade policies.
The letter asked Rangel to seek opportunities to discuss
trade with members of the Democratic Caucus who do not serve on the Ways
and Means Committee. There are no freshmen on the panel.
Meanwhile, Rangel
and Ways and Means ranking member Jim McCrery (R-LA) offered a glimpse
of areas of oversight the panel might pursue. On the agenda for the Trade
Subcommittee is oversight of the US-Korea free trade agreement negotiations
and other pending free trade agreements. Chinese intellectual property
and currency abuses - and strengthening US remedies against unfairly
traded imports - will be another area of focus.

Back to Wireline Contents
American Wire Producers Association
801 North Fairfax Street, Suite 211
Tel (703) 299-4434 | Fax (703) 299-9233 | E-mail info@awpa.org | Web: www.awpa.org
|